Expandindo competências para construir confiança no trabalho de curadoria de dados e de preservação

uma perspectiva pessoal

  • Jonathan Crabtree Odum Institute for Research in Social Science na Universidade da Carolina do Norte em Chapell Hill
Palavras-chave: Repositório digital. Confiabilidade. Preservação de informação. Curadoria de dados. Competência. Formação profissional.

Resumo

Repositórios confiáveis requerem padrões de tratamento, preservação e curadoria e de pessoal treinado e sensível para as especificidades do trabalho. Este artigo apresenta requisitos para o desenvolvimento de repositórios confiáveis e das competências pessoais requeridas do staff que deve atuar no processo de trabalho nesses ambientes, de forma a preservar os objetos digitais para as comunidades de usuários.

Referências

BAK, G. Trusted by whom? TDRs, standards culture and the nature of trust. Archival Science, v. 16, n. 4, p. 373–402, 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9257-1.

BENGTSSON, M. How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, v. 2, p.8–14, 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001.

BEST practices | Datapass. [2019]. Disponível em: http://www.data-pass.org/best-practices.html. Acesso em: 18 Julho. 2019.

CENTER FOR RESEARCH LIBRARIES. 2014. Disponível em: http://www.crl.edu/. Acesso em: 7 dez. 2014.

CENTER FOR RESEARCH LIBRARIES. Certification and Assessment. [2019]. Disponível em: http://www.crl.edu/archiving-preservation/digital-archives/certification-and-assessment-digital-repositories. Acesso em: 18 Julho. 2019.

CENTER FOR RESEARCH LIBRARIES. Ten principles. Janeiro, 2007. Disponível em: http://www.crl.edu/archiving-preservation/digital-archives/metrics-assessing-and-certifying/core-re. Acesso em: 5 dez. 2014.

CENTER FOR RESEARCH LIBRARIES. TRAC Metrics. 2007. Disponível em: http://www.crl.edu/archiving-preservation/digital-archives/metrics-assessing-and-certifying/trac. Acesso em: 5 dez. 2014.

CENTER FOR RESEARCH LIBRARIES (CRL). Trustworthy repositories audit & certification: criteria and checklist. Ohio: OCLC, 2007. Retrieved from http://www.crl.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/pages/trac_0.pdf

CENTER FOR RESEARCH LIBRARIES (CRL). Certification and Assessment of Digital Repositories. 2018. Disponível em: https://www.crl.edu/archiving-preservation/digital-archives/certification-assessment. Acesso em: 27 mar. 2018.

CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE FOR SPACE DATA SYSTEMS. Reference model for an open archival information system (OAIS) (Magenta Book No. 650.0-M–2). Washington, D.C.: National Aeronautics Space Agency, 2012. Disponível em: http://public.ccsds.org/publications/archive/650x0m2.pdf.

CORETRUSTSEAL (CTS). Core Trustworthy Data Repositories Requirements. [s.l.]: CoreTrustSeal Board, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.17026/dans-22n-gk35.

Crabtree, Jonathan, 2019, "The Odum Institute Technology Background Paper", UNC Dataverse, V1. Disponível em: Acesso em: 18 jul. 2019.

CRABTREE, J. (2013). Building on the work of colleagues: a moment of reflection. IASSIST Quarterly, Special Volume Honoring Sue Dodd, Spring-Winter 2013. Disponível em: http://www.iassistdata.org/sites/default/files/iqvol371_4_crabtree.pdf.
DATA DOCUMENTATION INITIATIVE (DDI). Welcome to the Data Documentation Initiative. 2019. Disponível em: http://www.ddialliance.org/Acesso em: 18 jul. 2019.

DIGITAL CURATION CENTRE: because good research needs good data. (2018). Disponível em: http://www.dcc.ac.uk/. Acesso em: 20 abr. 2016.

DILLO, I.; De LEEUW, L. Ten years back, five years forward: the data seal of approval. International Journal of Digital Curation, v. 10, n. 1, p.230–239, 2015. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v10i1.363.

DINGWALL, G. Trusting archivists: The role of archival Ethics Codes in establishing public faith. The American Archivist, v. 67, n. 1, p. 11–30, 2014. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.67.1.mw0914r2p52xx2t4.

DONALDSON, D. R.; DILLO, I.; DOWNS, R.; RAMDEEN, S. The perceived value of acquiring data seals of approval. International Journal of Digital Curation, v. 12, n. 1, p. 130–151, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v12i1.481.

GARRETT, J.; WATERS, D. Preserving digital information. 1996. Disponível em: https://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub63/. Acesso em: 6 dez. 2014.

GIARETTA, D. OAIS model and certification of trusted digital repositories. 2012. Disponível em: http://93.63.166.138:8080/dspace/bitstream/2012/117/3/Giaretta-David-CH2012-OAIS%20model%20and%20certification%20of%20trusted%20digital%20repositories.pdf

HOCKX-YU, H.; KNIGHT, G. What to preserve?: significant properties of digital objects. International Journal of Digital Curation, v. 3, n. 1, p. 141–153, 2008. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v3i1.49

INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION (ISO). 2019. Disponível em: http://www.iso.org/iso/home.htm. Acesso em: 18 jul. 2019.

ISO 9000 quality management - ISO. 2019. Disponível em: http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_9000. Acesso em: 18 jul. 2019.

ISO 14721:2012 - Space data and information transfer systems -- Open archival information system (OAIS) -- Reference model. 2019. Disponível em:http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=57284. Acesso em: 18 jul. 2019.

ISO 15489-1:2001 - Information and documentation -- Records management -- Part 1: General. 2001. Disponível em: http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=31908. Acesso em: 6 dez. 2014.

ISO 16363:2012 - Space data and information transfer systems -- Audit and certification of trustworthy digital repositories. 2012. Disponível em: http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=56510. Acesso em: 5 dez. 2014.

ISO 16919:2014 - Space data and information transfer systems -- Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of candidate trustworthy digital repositories. 2014. Disponível em: http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=57950. Acesso em: 5 dez. 2014.

ISO/IEC 17021:2011 - Conformity assessment -- Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems. 2011. Disponível em: http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=56676. Acesso em: 5 dez. 2014.

ISO/IEC 17799:2005/Cor 1:2007 -. 2005. Disponível em: http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=46381. Acesso em: 6 dez. 2014.

KELLY, S. E. Qualitative Interviewing Techniques and Styles. In: BOURGEAULT, I.; DINGWALL, R.; DE VRIES, R. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Methods in Health Research. London: SAGE Publications, 2010. p. 307–326. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446268247.n17

LEE, C. A. Open Archival Information System (OAIS) reference model. In: ENCYCLOPEDIA of Library and Information Sciences. 3. Ed. Boca Raton, Fl: CRC Press 2009, 2009. p. 4020–4030. Disponível em: https://ils.unc.edu/callee/p4020-lee.pdf.

MERRIAM WEBSTER DICTIONARY. 2019? Disponível em https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/trust. Acesso em: 22 jul. 2019.

NESTOR |- nestor-Siegel. 2019. Disponível em: https://www.langzeitarchivierung.de/Webs/nestor/EN/Zertifizierung/nestor_Siegel/siegel.html . Acesso em: 18 jul. 2019.

NOWELL, L. S.; NORRIS, J. M.; WHITE, D. E.; MOULES, N. J. Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, v. 16, n. 1, p. 1-13, 2017. 160940691773384. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847.

PIRSON, M.; MALHOTRA, D. Foundations of organizational trust: what matters to different stakeholders? Organization Science, v. 22, n. 4, p. 1087–1104, 2011. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0581.

PREMIS Editorial Committee. PREMIS data dictionary for preservation metadata (2.1). 201). Disponível em: http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/v2/premis-2-0.pdf.


PRIETO, A. G. From conceptual to perceptual reality: trust in digital repositories. Library Review, v. 58, n. 8, p. 593–606, 2009. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1108/00242530910987082.

PTAB. 2018. Disponível em: http://www.iso16363.org/. Acesso em: 21 abr. 2016.

PTAB. The ISO 16363 site. 2018. Disponível em: http://www.iso16363.org/. Acesso em: 5 dez. 2014.

PURPOSIVE sample. In LAVRAKAS, P. Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. California: Sage Publ., 2008. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963947.n419.

RESEARCH LIBRARIES GROUP (RLG). Trusted digital repositories: attributes and responsibilities. Mountain View, CA, 2002. Disponível em: http://www.oclc.org/resources/research/activities/trustedrep/repositories.pdf

ROSS, S.; MCHUGH, A. The role of evidence in establishing trust in repositories. D-Lib Magazine, v. 12, n.7/8, 2006. Dispoível em: https://doi.org/10.1045/july2006-ross.

ROWLEY, J. Conducting research interviews. Management Research Review, v. 35, n. 3/4, p. 260–271, 2012. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171211210154.

SPECK, J. G. Protecting public trust: an archival wake-up call. Journal of Archival Organization, v. 8, n.1, p. 31–53, 2010. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/15332748.2010.483389

THE DATAVERSE Network. 2018. Disponível em: http://thedata.org/. Acesso em: 7 dez. 2018.

THE DATAVERSE Project. [s.l.]: Dataverse.org., 2019. Disponível em: http://dataverse.org/.
Acesso em: 18 Julho. 2019.

THE ODUM INSTITUTE. About the archive. 2019. Disponível em: https://odum.unc.edu/archive/about/Acesso em: 18 jul. 2019.

THE ODUM INSTITUTE. Advancing social science teaching and research. 2019. Disponível em: http://www.odum.unc.edu/odum/home2.jsp. Acesso em: 18 jul. 2019.

THE ODUM INSTITUTE. Data management services. 2019. Disponível em: https://odum.unc.edu/archive/managementcuration/. Acesso em: 18 jul. 2019.

WHAT is MAXQDA? [s.d.]. Disponível em: https://www.maxqda.com/what-is-maxqda. Acesso em: 21 fev. 2019.

YAKEL, E., FANIEL, I., KRIESBERG, A., & YOON, A. Trust in digital repositories. International Journal of Digital Curation, v. 8, n. 1, p. 143-156, 2013. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v8i1.251

YOON, A. Data reuse and users’ trust judgments: toward trusted data curation. 2015. Disponível em: https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/record/uuid:2c2268b3-88cf-4397-b038-b39e88f80d83

YOON, A. End users’ trust in data repositories: definition and influences on trust development. Archival Science, v. 14, n.1, p.17–34, 2014. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-013-9207-8.
Publicado
20-08-2019
Como Citar
CRABTREE, J. Expandindo competências para construir confiança no trabalho de curadoria de dados e de preservação. REVISTA ELETRÔNICA DA ABDF, v. 3, n. 1, p. p. 74-102, 20 ago. 2019.